Val Dumond, publisher, writer, editor, and author
Val Dumond

words and music

Author

Publisher

Editor

Consultant

home page
about publisher and editor Val Dumond
publishing and editing services
Muddy Puddle Press publishing company
books authored by Val Dumond
Val's writers group
writers workshops by Val Dumond, publisher and editor

publishing, editing, and writing links
contact Val Dumond

 

Grammar For Grownups
A manual for people who have to use language in the real world.

To Spell or Not To Spell?
by Val Dumond
©2007

Ah, that is the question! Realizing the difficulty in finding "rules" for grammar in a nation built on the diversity of its citizens, the problem of spelling is particularly annoying. What may have survived as a spelling rule in England's English may become a conundrum in American English.

How do you spell that place that shows movies or presents plays? The Brits spell it "theatre". But Americans doffed much of the British spelling when they ran their army out of this country in the 1700s. Now you'll find local color in theaters, rather than local colour in theatres. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Here are some other conundrums (or is it conundra?) in American English spelling.

Latin words follow certain patterns. The single noun ending in "um" is replaced with "a" for its plural (medium/media, curriculum/curricula, datum/data, addendum/addenda). The single noun ending in "us" is replaced with an "i" for the plural (alumnus/alumni, nucleus/nuclei, stimulus/stimuli). The single noun ending in "a" becomes plural by adding an "e" or "ę" (alumna/alumnę, formula/formulę, vertebra/vertebrę). The "a" in Latin denotes "feminine", so don't call all graduates of a school "alumni". Some of them are "alumnę".

There's one more Latin ending that confuses: "ex" or "ix" (index, appendix). And while the Latin purists cling to the "ices" ending (indices, appendices), American English recognizes "indexes" and "appendixes".

We're loosening up in other Latin words too. Latin words ending in "on" (criterion, phenomenon) are easily made plural by adding "s" (criterions, phenomenons), rather than the Latin "a" (criteria, phenomena). And those French "eau" words that take an "x" to make them plural in their native tongue (bureau/bureaux, trousseau/trousseaux) can be turned into plurals in American English with a simple "s".

Luckily, many of those Latin words have been Americanized with the usual addition of "s" or "es" ( nucleuses, formulas, vertebras). As for proper names ending in "s", just add "es" as in Adams/Adamses (that means the entire family). Or Jones/Joneses. Yeah, it's cumbersome, but oh so meaningful!

Now we come to the devious nouns-ending-in-o! Oh, oh, oh! Now there's a real conundrum, requiring formulę of several sometimes-conflicting "rules" devised by wily linguistics professors in the past with the cunning purpose of completely confusing later generations of writers.

Miss Miller (my own dear third grade teacher, who taught me grammar) gave us four rules to swallow. (Some of us choked them down, only to come up with a simpler way many many years later.) Here are Miss Miller's four rules for making plural those nouns ending in "o":

1. Add an "s" to words ending with "o" preceded by a vowel (radio, studio, video, portfolio).

2. Add "es to certain nouns ending in "o" preceded by a consonant (tomato, potato, veto, hero, tuxedo, dynamo, tornado, torpedo). Notice this doesn't say "all nouns".

3. Add an "s" to musical terms ending in "o" (solo, piano, fortissimo, alto, soprano, crescendo, banjo).

4. Make your own choice with other words ending in "o" (the profs couldn't be bothered with any more rules, apparently). These either/or words include: motto, zero, cargo, memento, volcano, and the list changes with each new edition of a dictionary.

And to cover all bases, she told us we could add the simple "s" to any other words we find ending in "o". Thanks a lot, Miss Miller!

Now, here is Val's single rule for making plural those nouns ending in "o":

ADD AN "S"!

Nowhere have I found a noun ending in "o" that couldn't be clearly understood as plural with the simple "s" ending. Nowhere. Can you think of one?

It's because of these many choices that we have in spelling that I strongly advise writers to keep their own Style Manual. Sure, adopt one of the published ones if you like following someone else's thinking, but creative artists set their own guidelines, based on choices of their preferences.

Set up your own Style Manual. When you come to a word or phrase or grammar conundrum that requires a decision (and there are many, believe me), make your decision, write it in your Style Manual, and use it consistently in your writing. You will come across editors who may change it for their publication, but if it's your book, stick to your guns. You are the decider of many of your own grammar, punctuation, and spelling guidelines.

You can create your Style Manual in a simple notebook that you keep next to your computer, or you can create it in a file on your computer. In a very short time, you will remember your decisions because they will become second nature to you. Think of all the time you can save when you don't have to make a new decision every time.

[Much of this excerpt is from Val Dumond's Grammar For Grownups (HarperCollins 1993)]

Back to the main Articles page

Please feel free to contact me. I welcome your comments and any specific questions you may have.

 

Val's newest book
is now available!
Just Words:
The Us and Them Thing

 

Take this month's Grammar Quiz

 

What's Happening? Upcoming Events

 

 

Home | About Val | Publishing and Editing Services | Muddy Puddle Press | Writers Group | Links | Contact Val

Val Dumond
P.O. Box 97124
Tacoma, WA 98497
Phone/Fax: 253.582.5453
Email: Val@valdumond.com

 

 

Copyright ©2005 Val Dumond
Website design and hosting by